The United States Needs Canada to Survive

We have been pointing at the problems of the concentration of decision-making quite a bit recently, but we feel it bears repeating. Much blame for the 2007 Depression can be placed on, for example, the U.S. Federal Government allowing the super-huge American banks to become... well, super-huge. It gave those banks, and therefore their respective managements, so much power that the bad decisions made by the banks had global implications. The rest, as they say, is history.

Now the United States is hurtling down the first dip of the 2007 Depression, and the programmes for a quick "recovery" back to the consumer economy are only opium-induced hallucinations. In our opinion, the only real way to bring the Depression to a close is the old-fashioned way: liquidation, down-sizing, and reformation. If we were the optimistic type, we would suggest that the Government is running out of time to allow this. Realistically, though, we fear that the point-of-no-return is several economic pot-holes in the past.

So... where does that leave the average American citizen? Nowhere comfortable is our reply; the Citizenry is faced with a mind-numbingly-large (and exponentially growing) national debt, the fallout from the imploded consumer economy, and a world in a Depression. Whether or not the Citizenry is aware of this is another matter; the important point is that the United States probably will not be able to bring itself out of the 2007 Depression by its lonesome anymore.

Hence, the U.S. will need friends. Specifically, friends with usable industrial capacity, a less-unsound currency, a less-irresponsible Federal Government, and a Citizenry with a healthy work ethic. Bonus points for having a border with the U.S., as well as being a major trading partner.

We would suggest Canada: it is the only functional country which borders the U.S., and it offers the qualities we listed above, more-or-less. Canadian Citizens have their problems, to be sure, but Canada has not done many important things: the Federal Government hasn't been usurped by the super-huge banks; it isn't running massive wars of occupation; it hasn't annihilated its cities and industrial capacity in favour of strip malls and hair salons, it is the U.S.'s largest trading partner.

It seems, however, that the U.S. Federal Government is intent on de-friending Canada. We'll write more on this topic tomorrow.

Read part two here.

U.S. Industrial Output Does The Time Warp

One of the traditional ways to define a Depression from a recession (or "deep recession," as some prefer), is to see 1) a minimum 10% decline in Gross Domestic Product, as well as 2) a recession which lasts over three years. We have argued previously that the United States has been in a recession since 1999 or 2000, so the second proviso is probably well exceeded. The first is more difficult to pin down, since the GDP numbers in the United States are typically manipulated for political reasons.

One can find reasonable proxies for GDP data in the news organs of the U.S., as well as Government data. As our co-writer has previously noted, retail sales were down an adjusted 9.2% (source, see Table 2) year-over-year from this past February.

Additionally, the latest information suggests that U.S. industrial output has dropped a whopping 12.8%, year-over-year this March. This is the lowest level of output since December of 1998; an entire decade of output has already been lost in the 2007 Depression, only a year and a half in.
Add to that the Federal Reserve's report that industrial capacity utilisation fell to 69.3%, the lowest level on record since recording began in 1967, and the economy is looking pretty grim indeed.

As it is industry, not retail or High Finance, which makes an economy functional, this drop is very troubling. It represents both serious unemployment, and - perhaps worse still - the destruction of productive capacity via lack of maintenance. We say worse, because although new workers can be trained by old workers, the knowledge is useless if the machines are unusable. It is exactly this in the oil industry: the longer prices stay down, the more capacity to meet future demands will be annihilated.

Whatever the case, though, the picture can be shaded even darker, as the Census Bureau suggests that, year-over-year in February, the drop was more like 14.8% (source, Table 2).

Considering all this information, we feel it is possible to give a hypothetical time-frame for the duration of this Depression. Assuming a 15% year-over-year drop in output, and also assuming that the economy will find an initial bottom after a 50% drop, we posit that the bottom will possibly be in about three years from now (as one additional year has already past). After that, we think a 75% drop-from-peak is probably the longer-term outlook, but that time-frame is not predictable at present.