Commentary on the FDIC Bank Failure Report (05 March 2010)

Apologies on not updating for the last two-plus weeks. We have a large project which we're in the throes of wrapping up, so quite a bit of other things fell off the table, FDIC reports being one of them.

* * *

The last two weeks' closures were relatively unremarkable, except for their small-ish size - none were larger than $1 billion. Even the least recoverable bank, Rainier Community Bank, wasn't all that bad: it was 'only' 48.25 cents on the dollar. Below average, yes, but not a bell-ringer, as the tenth worst failure by recoverable value - Century Bank FSB - was 40.72 cents on the dollar. Rainier's board of directors needed to fritter away another 8 cents per asset dollar to make our prestigious Ten Nastiest Bank Closures.

Oh well, maybe next time.

It is presently fashionable to blame the U.S. for the ongoing Depression, and we are only too happy to join in: the U.S. banking system has, for the past decade, exported rot and decay to the rest of the world, in the form of securities and derivatives, passed off by the credit rating agencies as somehow AAA debt. In 2007 the domestic became so unutterably septic that even the U.S. banks couldn't handle it anymore, and so the system broke down. Left to its own devices, the banking system would have imploded, taken down the U.S. economy and Government, knocked the stuffing out of the world economy, and then that would have been that.

That obviously did not happen, and now that same rot and decay is not only still extant in the world economy, but the U.S. is attempted to restart the exportation of more, so as to stave off domestic economic collapse. Both issues have severe implications for the rest of the world: first, if said securities and derivatives are not expurgated from the economy, they will with age become even more poisonous than they are now; and second, if the U.S. managed to force-feed more toxic assets to the rest of the world, there will be just that much more poison in the system.

What that means for the person on the ground, trying to make his or her way through this Depression, is rather grim. The greatest Keynesian-Fisherian nightmare is mass liquidation; which is to say, everything must go. We posit that the Keynesians presently holding the purse-strings in the central banks of the world are only forestalling the inevitable, and thereby making the future situation worse, in exchange for papering over the present. When the papering-over fails, as we suspect it will, then more of the baby will be thrown out with the bathwater; or, more good assets (e.g. precious metals, tools, bicycles, et cetera) might collapse in value with those assets which have none to begin with (e.g. AAA rated debt, designer clothing, suburbia, et cetera). This facet will make investing one's financial resources very difficult; indeed, down not so much might become the new high return.

Since the ongoing Depression was fomented in the U.S., we suspect that the next big leg down will also come from the U.S. When - not if - this next drop occurs, we suspect that the FDIC will be caught flat-footed and flat broke. That situation might already be in place, and the economy is not crashing fast enough to reveal the tenuous position of the FDIC, but whatever the case, going into the future, having large and vital amounts of cash sitting on deposit at banks will become a riskier proposition. Put another way, a bank account will change from being an asset, to a liability, for the average person.

Some banks will be better off than other. Some might even be perfectly solvent and capable of performing adequately, and be able to defend their depositors' money. Tying back into our earlier comment, it is highly possible that these rare, healthy banks will be destroyed along with the bad banks, either by hapless Government intervention, or panicked bank runs, or both.

FDIC Bank Failure Report

This week, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation closed only one bank: Georgian Bank of Atlanta, Georgia. Total declared asset value of the closed bank was approximately $2,000,000,000, and total deposits were approximately $2,000,000,000. The cost to the FDIC is estimated at $892,000,000. According to our methodology, the recoverable value of Georgian Bank was $1,108,000,000, or only 55.40% of the declared asset value.

Cumulative cost-to-FDIC was brought to $45,704,800,000. This closure brings the total declared assets of FDIC-failed banks (since December of 2007) to $478,389,780,000, and total FDIC-insured deposits to $320,552,620,000. This includes the assets and deposits of Washington Mutual, which can now be included in data analysis due to our new methodology. The recoverable value of all failed banks was only $274,847,820,000, or 57.45% of the declared value.

***

This week's closure was below the national average of failed banks, but it is far from attractive. Such a low recoverable value is a sign of some serious problems within the U.S. banking system; problems which have not, by any stretch of the imagination, been worked out or 'TARPed' from existence.

Since there is a distinct likelihood that a good chunk of the banking system is overvalued to about this degree (e.g. 55% recoverability or so), we can only assume that the FDIC is purposefully dragging its feet on closing those banks which are in the worst shape. This would make sense, especially considering if approximately half of the entire banking system's assets are toxic waste!

Given that scenario, though, a serious problem arises: it means that the FDIC's exhaulted insurance is nothing but a Ponzi scheme. If indeed the banking system is that insolvent, or even approxmiately that insolvent, then the money paid out on FDIC closures is simply the money which has been recently paid in by banks for the deposit insurance. Perhaps the FDIC chooses which bank to close, not based on how insolvent or zombiod it is, but rather how much money is on hand to cover deposits...

***

On the basis of the ratio of bank closures to population (i.e. simply the number of failures in the State, with no account of assets or deposits), the ten most afflicted states are:

1. Georgia
2. Nevada
3. Illinois
4. Utah
5. Kansas
6. Oregon
7. Minnesota
8. Missouri
9. Washington
10. Florida

We are replacing the losses-to-assets analysis by State, with a recoverable value analysis by State. However, we are still retooling our data, but we expect that we will be ready to provide this analysis with next week's closures.