Inflation Coming Soon?

We hold up USA Today as the ultimate sign of what is not, in fact happening. If the rag says to do one thing, we know it's a bad idea; if it says that something is happening, we know it isn't. Which is, as an aside, how we expect to know the bottom of the 2007 Depression is in: USA Today will be screaming that the end is near and everyone is going to die... metaphorically speaking.

That is all a bit arch, of course, but you get the idea. As a for-profit company of popular persuasion, USA Today and other information sources have to amend what they publish in order to maintain mass appeal. The public at large does not want to read or hear especially gloomy news, which is probably why our Depression Gazette will never hit the big time. USA Today, as long as enough people feel it provides the desired style and quality of information, will continue to limp along.

Limping along, however, does not make what the company prints actually accurate. And in that vein, we present this article from USA Today, which spews some very impressive fallacies about the nature of inflation. We recommend reading the article with popcorn, as it is quite a laugh, but we'll take on some of the most egregious errors.

"If inflation does hit, it won't be this year, barring a major jump in oil prices or a drastic change in government philosophy." We wonder how oil prices cause inflation. Additionally, according to ShadowStats.com, the Federal Reserve is printing physical money (i.e. growth in the M1 Money Supply) with abandon. That trend is about as iron-clad a guarantee of inflation, at some point in the future, as one can get. Indeed, the USA Today writer himself writes "The ultimate cause of inflation is an unwarranted increase in the money supply."

"...Unemployment... [is] 9.4% now and widely expected to break above 10% this year."Again according to ShadowStats.com, unemployment is cooking at well over 20% and rising sharply. We personally expect to see 25% unemployment be a reality sometime very soon, if that level has not been hit already. That's not to say that particular non-fact is necessarily the writer's fault, though: it's an artifact of the purposefully inaccurate and under-reporting nature of Government statistics.

The best part, though, was this:

If you're worried about inflation rearing its ugly head soon, relax... You don't get inflation in an economy that's as slack as this one... Inflation just isn't going to happen in this economy.

"A lot of the worries about immediate inflation are examples of financial illiteracy," says David Wyss, chief economist for Standard & Poor's. "You won't get inflation until the economy gets back, and that's at least five years out."... To get to inflation... you need a humming economy, and the [U.S.] economy is barely breathing.

Oh, where do we start, dear Reader? How do we assail such a monument to stupidity? To say that inflation cannot happen except in a 'humming economy' is like saying... oh gods, we don't know! Words fail us utterly!

So instead, we would like to take a trip to reality for a moment and provide an example: Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe's economy has not been truly 'humming' since it was a colony of the British Crown (pre-1965). In fact, it has been in negative 'humming' since 2000 (source), and official unemployment in the nation is now a horrifying 94%. Yet this nation is experiencing an inflation rate so high it is effectively meaningless: 231 million percent annualised. It is lunacy - or perhaps misinformation - to say that inflation requires a 'humming economy' to take place. Zimbabwe is chilling proof of the total untruth of such an assertion.

These errors we've expounded upon, plus a few more, are shockingly out of character with the rest of the article, which is fairly sober and accurate. The writer seems to be going out of his way to drive home his fallacious definition of inflation, and we can only wonder why. Whatever the case, though, we take this as a sign for the contrarians: inflation this way comes. And soon.

A Modest Proposal to Save the United States

We've been following the affairs of the United States' automobile manufacturers rather closely. It's an interesting situation, one that we think deserves more analysis that it seems to be getting. The moves to nationalise the companies, as we wrote about in an earlier article, seem to suggest that one of the most probable outcomes will be the foundation of 'AmeriCar'.

The notion of a nationalised automobile manufacturer is not outside of the realm of possibility, in this bailout-happy era of U.S. policy-making. It carries with it a guarantee of employing thousands of people, backstops what James Kunstler calls the "Happy Motoring fiesta," and more-or-less (mostly less) preserves the appearance of the status quo. All these appear to be the avowed goals of the Obama Administration, so the situation really is ripe for this particular flavour of Lemon Socialism. If the AmeriCar future is true, we have some thoughts as to how the Government can help make the continuation of the Happy Motoring fiesta more durable.

All that we suggest is the phasing in of a national speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Municipalities could, of course, have lower speed limits, but the highest legal speed in the United States would be 35 mph. Ignoring the indignant screams of rage from the Citizenry, this vastly lower limit would bring many positive changes:

The loss of life in automobile accidents would fall dramatically to near zero, reducing the cost of cleaning up the wreck, the medical bills, and fixing any damage done to public roadways. The repair cost of automobile collisions would be greatly reduced, since at 35 mph the force involved in any one collision is relatively low. The wear on public roadways and bridges would fall dramatically, allowing for more maintenance money to be diverted from maintenance to building more infrastructure.

Additionally, the reduced speed limit would force citizens to live closer to their places of work. By vastly cutting commutes, this would give citizens more time to spend with their families (or work more, according to preference). Also, the amount of energy burned daily by citizens going to work would be vastly reduced, thereby cutting the United States' dependence on 'foreign oil.' At the same time, this would automatically increase the density of American cities, which would both give a larger tax base to those cities, as well as make public services cheaper (i.e. more people are paying less).

We could go on, but we hope the point is made. A simple and elegant piece of legislation, like a vastly reduced national speed limit, could perform a world of change. Many of the apparent goals of the Obama Administration could be serviced by a lower speed limit. To be honest, we fully believe that this sort of legislation will never see the light of day. Such well-reasoned, functional mandates seem to be beyond the abilities of the Government.

The Severity of the Situation

Recently an aid to the Saudi Arabian oil ministry stated oil demand may fall 23% to 45%. This is a startlingly candid figure coming from a rather conservative and secretive organisation. If oil demand is falling that much, economic activity as a whole is pretty much falling on par, and the 2007 Depression will become more like Great Depression II, if not the Greatest Depression Ever.

On the other hand, Saudi Arabia is known for its disinformation campaigns. All the while oil was rising from $30 a barrel to $140, Saudi Arabia said "we have plenty of oil at lower prices, it's just that no one wants to buy it." The present situation could be that the Saudis are now recognising the long-predicted collapse of their oil production is now imminent. What better way to cover up their declining production potential than to say "no one wants it."

This in itself would be bad news, of course. It would be more evidence of the certainty of peak oil, and the tremendous difficulty that would present to the world's economies.

A halving of income for citizens of the 'Developed Countries' may well be baked into the cake by now - whether the drop in oil production is cause or effect. It is not a pretty thought, but it would be best to plan for some pretty tough times ahead. Most predictions from mainstream media should be discounted, as they will be attempting not to sound alarmist. Pollyannish advice such as "it's never been a better time to buy real estate," or "the current recession is a bump in the road to greater prosperity" should be seen as a quick route to financial suicide.

The growth paradigm of the past few centuries is over. While up until recently, recession and depression were interruptions of chronic growth; for the foreseeable future, spurts of growth and recovery will be interruptions of chronic collapse. This is quite a change, and at first few will be able to wrap their heads around it. It will turn a lot of rules of thumb upside down.

We are not saying all is doom and gloom. As long as people have the liberty to innovate, the world will adjust to a new (and possibly better) way of doing things. It is possible to live quite well on a 'low throughput' diet. Thrift, conservation, invention and efficiency can deliver a good life on a low budget. On that you can bank.

Signs of Nonfunctional Markets

Free markets are supposed to be very efficient. The general law of supply and demand states that if people want something, the market will provide at the proper cost. This 'cost' includes, at the very least: the cost of the raw materials required; the cost of manufacturing; the cost of delivery to market. Profit usually sneaks in there somewhere, but profit itself is a type of cost. It should suffice to say that the cost of a desired item is typically reflective of the cost to make another, similar/identical item.

When the cost of an item goes below its replacement cost, any number of things may be happening: the market for the item may be saturated, and people don't want to buy anymore; the item might have been so utterly hideous that no one would pay money for it. Most pertinent to our article, though, is when people line up to buy the item, but there is none to be had at the market's price.

A good example of this is in the silver and gold markets. Presently, physical bullion commands a fairly respectable premium over the official market price. Those premiums represent a disconnect, and a rather serious one at that. Healthy demand exists for physical bullion -- perhaps even more than ever -- but that is a demand that cannot be filled based on the official market price. In essence, two markets have developed: the official and the real-world. This is a sign of a serious market break-down, one which will likely have some serious, lasting repercussions.

More than just the bullion markets have been effected, though. One can see a similar situation developing in the oil and natural gas market. The Federal Reserve's zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) is another good example of breakdown. No normal human being can borrow money even remotely close to the Fed's target rate of zero... but yet there it is. This is a disconnect of credit: the official market says no interest, the real-world market has other ideas. Further government intervention and manipulation in markets will result in similar breakdowns, especially as the 2007 Depression progresses.